Vörr AICareersContact
Book a Demo
VÖRR Code & Infrastructure Intelligence.

An AI Plugin built for Engineering at Scale.

Vörr connects your code, cloud, deployments, monitoring, incidents, and other engineering tools, allowing AI to answer questions using the reality of your systems instead of relying on prompts, assumptions, or incomplete context.

Trusted By
See it work

Let your AI have the complete picture.

Vörr sits between your AI assistant and your engineering systems, continuously collecting and connecting the context needed to understand how your applications actually work.

ClaudeClaudeconnected
POST /api/v1/orders/checkout latency jumped right after the new code was pushed — can you check Grafana and the latest commits and find why?
Claude
Asking Vörr

Yes — I checked Grafana, the latest deploy, and the commits pushed before the spike.

After the 11:42 AM deploy, p95 on POST /api/v1/orders/checkout rose 420 ms → 2.8 s within ~5 min.

Cause is commit 9f3a21c — add coupon validation before order creation: it moved coupon checks into the checkout flow, so pricing is now called once per cart item instead of once per order. For 8–12-item carts that's a burst of sequential GET /pricing/validate-coupon calls.

checkout-api · p95420ms → 2.8s
pricing-service · rpm180 → 1.9k
pricing-service · p95210ms → 950ms

Root cause

Coupon validation runs sequentially per item instead of one batched call for the whole cart.

Where

services/checkout/src/checkout.service.tsvalidateCouponForItems(cart.items)

Fix

Send the full cart, validate the coupon once, return the final discount — instead of looping per item. That brings checkout back near baseline.

✓ verified · Grafana · Git · checkout-api
Reply to Claude…
asks · grounds
VÖRR AICentral Intelligencereasoning
reads · read-only
Code & delivery
Cloud & infra
Monitoring & incidents
+ more integrations
Connect your cloud
One live graph across your clouds
AWS
AWS Available now
Azure
AzureUpcoming
Google Cloud
Google CloudUpcoming
AWS today — Azure & GCP landing soon · more providers on request

Reads from the tools you already run (30+ Connectors)

DatadogDatadog
SentrySentry
OpenTelemetryOpenTelemetry
JenkinsJenkins
JaegerJaeger
SigNozSigNoz
PrometheusPrometheus
GrafanaGrafana
LokiLoki
TempoTempo
New RelicNew Relic
NagiosNagios
BugSnagBugSnag
ZipkinZipkin
VictoriaMetricsVictoriaMetrics
Grafana MimirGrafana Mimir
ThanosThanos
ElasticsearchElasticsearch
SplunkSplunk
DynatraceDynatrace
GrayLogGrayLog
CircleCICircleCI
ArgoCDArgoCD
KibanaKibana
Uptime KumaUptime Kuma
HarborHarbor
Drone CIDrone CI
Flux CDFlux CD
SonarQubeSonarQube
AlertmanagerAlertmanager
Nexus RepositoryNexus Repository
BuildkiteBuildkite
DatadogDatadog
SentrySentry
OpenTelemetryOpenTelemetry
JenkinsJenkins
JaegerJaeger
SigNozSigNoz
PrometheusPrometheus
GrafanaGrafana
LokiLoki
TempoTempo
New RelicNew Relic
NagiosNagios
BugSnagBugSnag
ZipkinZipkin
VictoriaMetricsVictoriaMetrics
Grafana MimirGrafana Mimir
ThanosThanos
ElasticsearchElasticsearch
SplunkSplunk
DynatraceDynatrace
GrayLogGrayLog
CircleCICircleCI
ArgoCDArgoCD
KibanaKibana
Uptime KumaUptime Kuma
HarborHarbor
Drone CIDrone CI
Flux CDFlux CD
SonarQubeSonarQube
AlertmanagerAlertmanager
Nexus RepositoryNexus Repository
BuildkiteBuildkite
Vörr vs. the fragmented way

Don't Confuse Your AI with 1000+ MCP Tools. Less tools is less Hallucination.

The tools live at GenAI's end. Same question, same sources — the only difference is what GenAI has to choose from.

Confusing your AI with similar looking tools vs limited tools with precision meaning.
01 · Connectors
Ask: “where are checkout's errors coming from?”
Without Vörr
GenAI wires to every MCP → 1000+ tools
Claude1000+ toolsgithub·list_issuessentry·list_issuesdatadog·search_logsaws·get_log_eventsdatadog·get_metricsaws·get_metric_data…1000+ more?× 4 look-alikes — guessesGitHub MCPDatadog MCPAWS MCPSentry MCPGrafana MCP
Your AI loads every MCP tools into one huge list. Many names are identical and their function is also identical and your AI can't tell them apart and starts guessing.
VS
With Vörr
Expose limited tools for higher precision.
Claude46 toolsGet errors ✓Get logs (lines)Get metricsGet service dependenciesGet tracesGet service health…46 total · all distinct✓ validated answer
GitHubDatadogAWSSentryGrafana
Vörr has only 46 tools which your AI calls, and Vörr acts like an orchestrator routing these requests to the underlying tech stack.
The difference

Add Context. Add Confidence – Get The Complete Picture.

ClaudeUngrounded
I'm seeing repeated 500 errors in Sentry for one of our APIs. I've attached the Sentry error log, api.js, and the related config file. Can you check these and tell me what exactly is causing the error?
sentry-errors.log 31 KB api.js 12 KB config.js 2 KB
From the files you pasted, the 500s look like an unhandled exception somewhere in api.js— but I'm limited to these snippets. The config references env vars I can't resolve, and I don't have the full stack trace or the requests that triggered each error, so I can't pin the exact line or rule out a DB timeout vs. a null value vs. a bad config. My best guess is a missing credential in the config or an unhandled rejection in a handler. To be sure, you'd need to line the Sentry events up with the actual deploy and the live config — which I can't see from here.
⚠ a guess — limited to what you pasted
ClaudeGrounded
Sentry is showing repeated 500 errors for this API. Can you check what's causing it?
It's POST /api/orders/checkout — Sentry logged 214 events in 3h, every one identical: TypeError: cannot read 'id' of undefined at api.js:142 in createOrder().Root causesession.user is undefined. The auth middleware was dropped from this route in PR #391("simplify checkout flow", merged 4h ago), so the session never gets populated.GitHub — the diff removes requireAuth from routes/orders.ts:23; the 500s start at the exact deploy timestamp.Fix: re-add requireAuth on the /checkout route, or guard session.user before api.js:142.
✓ grounded · Sentry · GitHub
VS
ClaudeUngrounded
My load balancer shows a sudden traffic increase (screenshot attached). VM CPU and RAM aren't high, but API response time climbs once we hit ~100 parallel requests. I've also attached the Nginx access logs and config. Can you review these and tell me what's wrong and how to debug it properly?
lb-traffic.png · 96 KB
nginx-access.log 54 KB nginx.conf 3 KB
If CPU and RAM are fine but latency climbs at ~100 concurrent requests, the bottleneck probably isn't the VM. With low resource use, the usual suspects are a connection/worker limit (Nginx worker_connections or upstream keepalive), a small DB connection pool, or blocking I/O downstream. But I only have the access log and nginx.confyou pasted — I can't see your app's pool settings, DB metrics, or thread state under load, so I can't tell which limit you're actually hitting. You'd have to check those yourself while reproducing the load.
⚠ a guess — limited to what you pasted
ClaudeGrounded
Response time starts increasing when traffic reaches around 100 parallel requests. Can you check what's causing the bottleneck?
It's the database connection pool — not Nginx or the VM. The payments-api pool is capped at 20 (db/pool.ts:14), and Datadog shows p95 on /api/orders jumping 180 ms → 2.7 s the moment active DB connections hit 20/20 and requests start queuing.Nginx is fine — worker_connections 1024, only ~12% used at peak, so it isn't the limiter.Postgresmax_connections is 100, of which other services already hold ~40, leaving room to grow the pool safely.Fix: raise the pool max (start at 50) and add a queue timeout in db/pool.ts:14, then re-run the load test.
✓ grounded · Datadog · Nginx · Postgres
VS
ClaudeUngrounded
One of our Kubernetes pods keeps going into CrashLoopBackOff. I'm sharing the pod error logs below. Can you check the logs, identify why the pod is failing, and give me the exact steps to fix it?
payments-worker.log 18 KB pod-status.txt 2 KB
A CrashLoopBackOff just means the container keeps failing and restarting — the real cause is the exit reason, which this log doesn't show. Killed with no message could be an OOM kill, a failed liveness probe, or the process receiving a signal; I can't tell which from the snippet alone. I also can't see the resource limits, the deployment manifest, or recent changes. You'd need to run kubectl describe pod (check Last State / Reason — e.g. OOMKilled vs Error), kubectl logs --previous, and review the probe and limit config — none of which I can do against your cluster from here.
⚠ a guess — limited to what you pasted
ClaudeGrounded
This pod is crashing repeatedly. Can you check the logs and tell me why it's failing?
The pod payments-worker-7c9f is being OOMKilled. kubectl describe shows Last State: Terminated, Reason: OOMKilled, Exit Code 137 — it's crashed 9 times in 20 min.Root cause — its memory limit is 256Mi (payments-worker.yaml:38), but the batch job added in PR #402 loads the full invoice set into memory and peaks at ~410Mi.Jenkins — that change deployed 35 min ago, exactly when the crashes began.Fix: raise the limit to 512Mi at payments-worker.yaml:38, or stream the invoices in batches in worker/invoices.ts:60 instead of loading them all at once.
✓ grounded · Kubernetes · Jenkins
VS
Works insideClaude ClaudeChatGPT ChatGPTCodex CodexClaude Code Claude CodeCursor Cursor
Pricing

One context layer. Priced to scale.

Usage-based pricing for the Vörr Cloud context layer — or run it fully self-hosted with BYOC. No hidden add-ons.

Every Cloud plan includes:Cloud Mapper + all connectors · one live graph across AWS, GCP & Azure · read-only · works with your Claude & ChatGPT accounts. Billed monthly.

Starter
$299/ month
Best for Small Teams with cloud bills less than $5000 per month.
  • 3,000 tool callsper day
  • 1 cloud account
  • 200 resource instances
Get access
Most popular
Growth
$499/ month
Best for Small-Sized Teams with cloud bills less than $15000 per month.
  • 10,000 tool callsper day
  • 3 cloud accounts
  • 800 resource instances
Get access
Scale
$999/ month
Best for Mid-Sized Teams with cloud bills less than $60000 per month.
  • 30,000 tool callsper day
  • 10 cloud accounts
  • 3,000 resource instances
Get access
Enterprise
Let's talk
Best for Large-Sized Teams with cloud bills more than $60000 per month.
  • Unlimited tool calls
  • Unlimited cloud accounts
  • Unlimited resource instances
Talk to sales
BYOC · Self-hosted

Bring your own cloud

Run Vörr fully inside your own infrastructure — your data never leaves your cloud.

starting from $2,999
Talk to sales →

Founding pricing · locked while in beta · onboard in under a day

Proof, not a pitch

Still have doubts about Vörr AI?

This entire page is built by Vörr AI.

Still have doubts? - Ask Vörr
Product assistant · Online

Hi — I'm the Vörr assistant. Ask me how Vörr works, how it compares to wiring up raw MCPs, how it keeps your data safe, or what it can answer about your stack. If you'd rather talk to an engineer, I'll point you the right way.

Quick check to keep bots out — verify you're human to start chatting.
Vörr can make mistakes · reach a human at hello@frigga.cloud